mycorrado
07-17-2009, 05:06 AM
Someone I am helping had a small medical collection due to his insurance not paying timely.
During the collection process the insurance did pay the doctor, but they failed to remove the debt from collection.
the CA sued and at the first hearing the defendant brought all the documentation showing the debt was paid, and the attorney agreed to continue to the case until she researched that it was in fact all paid. She told the defendant he would get another notice if there was another court date. he never did.
Another court hearing was held and the attorney won a default, knowing full well the debt had been paid to the original creditor. Now the CA garnished wages and paid herself.
Is this egregious for a lawyer to pursue the suit when she had been presented facts of it being paid? not notifying the defendant of the contuance date?
I sugested to them to try to get it vacated. complaint to the bar?
Also, the normal fdcpa violation can be pursued for them never receiving a letter with the obtion to validate the debt. I assume these can be pursued regardless of the lawsuit and its post judgement status.
Also ultimately the Dr's office committed a violation for continued collection on a paid debt so can they go after them for a refund for the garnished wages right?
Thanks for your input!!!
During the collection process the insurance did pay the doctor, but they failed to remove the debt from collection.
the CA sued and at the first hearing the defendant brought all the documentation showing the debt was paid, and the attorney agreed to continue to the case until she researched that it was in fact all paid. She told the defendant he would get another notice if there was another court date. he never did.
Another court hearing was held and the attorney won a default, knowing full well the debt had been paid to the original creditor. Now the CA garnished wages and paid herself.
Is this egregious for a lawyer to pursue the suit when she had been presented facts of it being paid? not notifying the defendant of the contuance date?
I sugested to them to try to get it vacated. complaint to the bar?
Also, the normal fdcpa violation can be pursued for them never receiving a letter with the obtion to validate the debt. I assume these can be pursued regardless of the lawsuit and its post judgement status.
Also ultimately the Dr's office committed a violation for continued collection on a paid debt so can they go after them for a refund for the garnished wages right?
Thanks for your input!!!